i.e. I should known having owned the RX10iii and now using the RX10iv. If you are anything like me, I am outdoors for the full experience, hiking, nature and a bit of fitness. The Sony RX10 IV is among the most capable, all-in-one camera packages money can buy – read our full review.Earlier this week, we had the chance to spend a little more time shooting with it alongside Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake as they filmed the DPReview TV RX10 IV video review. The Sony a7 III and Fujifilm X-T4 aren't cameras we would normally compare head-to-head. Shooting sports, airplanes, people and pets running, and automobiles while using AF-C tracking and shooting bursts at 10fps my keeper rate is about 90%. Is there a 24mm to 600mm eqv lens at f4 available for the Olympus? Check out my P1000 review for birding. not sure about the mkIII mkIV, thought they were also the same though. Unfortunately, it showed up to the camera party a bit too early. Is the review incorrect ? I hate when reviewers use vague terms like “several”. F4=F4 on any camera whether it be a phone or a medium format camera. The lens in III and IV versions is optically considerably better than in the previous versions. I have a conundrum! It is still baffling why Nikon/Cannon are so slow to move forward. The unit feels solid in your hand if it will be able to withstand weathering with the moving parts. So the Pana has an important advantage here! The rx10iv is tempting, although I would had preferred the rx10i/ii f2.8 updated version rather than this monster, over 30 cm @600mm the unpractical placement of the screw mount just below the lcd is asking for trouble. The Sony a7S III is a 12MP full-frame camera primarily designed with video in mind. Almost all can do it but not that particular one, it appears to me a little bit weird??? However in the compare mode of the conclusion (scores), I noticed that the RX10IV scored much better in high-iso than the Olympus E-M1II, whereas images show the contrary: https://goo.gl/6w6yWz, That's a bigger sensor, a M43 sensor, on an interchangeable lens camera. First a little background, for hiking I have been using a Nikon P900 for a couple of years now, and I love it. I've found no problem at all for throwing the background out of focus for portraits. How ANY manage the trip from Japan, no human knows!! Sony DSC RX10 è una delle migliori bridge sul mercato e in questo video andremmo a fare dei test video di zoom e macro. dont il faut tenir compte.... could you share a link to see the images taken, I'm seriously looking for a all in camera. If you read the comments here from people who have this camera, you’ll hear that again and again. In other words in burst mode you can't zoom whilst firing the shots off. I lean towards the ax700 ( the same like the xf400 but w/o the xlr's) BUÉK neked is barátom. Good question, another question to those who own, is there a work around to this mentioned limitation? It’s super quick; the focus acquisition is subjectively instantaneous, and it’ll maintain focus at 24fps. Relive some of our favorite episodes and support our subscriber challenge: help us reach 300,000 subscribers by Valentine's Day and give Jordan a special challenge of his own. Based on the registered info, WW119533 is registered by Sony Wuxi, same as a6600, a6100 and RX100 VII. That doesn't mean it will suite everyone and every occasion to shoot that way. I fiddled a little with the settings to get the optimal setup, but I did not find it the most intuitive operation. For once a sensible and informed answer to the "equivalency" madness. All the pros I see shooting professional sports with primes are certainly serious sports shooters and obviously they don't zoom while shooting bursts. Not everyone shoots primes. relative to the FZ1000 (compare the RAWs at high ISO). So, if a light meter is telling you the the EV for a certain scene is 1/60th at F4 that's what you set on the camera regardless of senor size. Our team at DPReview TV just finished their review of the new Sony a1. I don't plan on selling my Canon 5D III anytime soon, but I suspect the RX10 will be the one I choose most often when I'm going to be out for the day. Almost any camera company has better ones. But in the RX10 it comes in a much more manageable package. Obviously the pros who shoot with primes are very serious sports shooters and can't zoom while shooting bursts. Finally I bought MKIII, I had to return it in a week, I can not with the maximum shutter speed of 1/1000, it seemed so absurd, that less than 1/2000 + ND incorporated. Cette prouesse des ingénieurs Sony et Zeiss est actuellement sans équivalent sur le marché. I will say that when it's working, it works flawlessly. Exposure is fundamental to photography so why would manufacturers advertise a lens as 24-600mm equivalent as F5.6-F11 instead of it's true apertures of F2.4-F4 when exposure is far more important than depth of field? Is this accurate or are the samples for the RX10 flawed? Build quality should be better—if Sony wants $1700 for a bridge cam, durability should be a given. If you want an all in one solution go with the RX10iv. I already have the FE28-135f4 power zoom lens, it's brilliant. I've been using this camera for over a month. Read our review to find out. There are a few other minor differences between the two cameras as well: 1/32,000 sec(e-shutter), 1/2000 (mechanical), 1/32,000 sec(e-shutter),1/2000 (mechanical), 1/32000 sec(e-shutter),1/2000 (mechanical), 1/16000 sec(e-shutter), 1/4000 (mechanical). The Natural History Museum selected one winner and four finalists for the annual Wildlife Photographer of the Year's People's Choice Awards. Very good points, Si Jou. Find out all the details in our field review. It’s like no other camera I’ve ever used in terms of how *ready* it is. Et de quatre. 2- The lens will give you deeper depth of field, it will give you a 24mm f/7.6 equivalent and 600mm f/12 equivalent, ramping throughout the range. The camera lens and available functions on the body are exceptional. 1- The lens will give you the same zoom as a 24-600mm on a FF camera (5D, A7, D810, etc). The processor is borrowed from the flagship Sony a9, which should mean excellent subject tracking. Sony RX10 IV vs Pana FZ2500 video recording limit: 30 minutes vs unlimited. The Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is a compact general-purpose lens for Sony's APS-C, E-mount mirrorless cameras. The zoom difference between the two is minimal (4.3 vs 4.8?) I truly felt this could be the answer to get that professional body, functionality and lens into a bridge camera. This cameras are all irrelevant, old, dead. If you don’t have the mk3 buy it. As such, we've gathered information, shared the rationale behind our decision to cover the project and more. Last Friday, a pair of real estate photographers captured images near a park in San Francisco. Many companies have lied when posting their camera models /or lenses. I am surprised how many times I find myself using images from the RX10 IV instead of one of my FF shots. Have a look! @tbcass The maneuver I'm talking about takes under 2 seconds from the first worthwhile shot, to a wide angle shot, with most of the worthwhile photos being taken in the first second. Yeah, I caught that too. Conservation Mag is an Amazon affiliate, by clicking on the links to do your shopping you support us without paying anything extra. Actually an 18-400 lens on an APS-C camera will have inferior IQ to the RX10iv. What would be nice is if the flash on this camera popped up a bit higher. 600mm f/12 is pretty blown out background! It's time to announce the winners of the first round of voting! How would you determine what the price should be? Bridge - Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III - Noir + Objectif 24-600 mm reconditionné Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III pas cher Remis à neuf Jusqu'à 10% moins cher. The Sony RX10 IV is among the most capable all-in-one camera packages money can buy, and we've updated our gallery with plenty more samples. – Pour un débutant ou juste sorti de ce stade, il constituera le meilleur appareil au … As you can see, the RX10 IV stacks up nicely next to its siblings and direct competitors. Yes, but best to have a tracking tripod---especially for Video. Researcher, Lecturer, PhD Student. Sony Cyber-shot RX10 Mark IV Succédant au Sony Cyber-shot RX10 Mark III, le Sony Cyber-shot RX10 Mark IV est un bridge expert qui récupère l'optique de son aïeul, un excellent 24-600 mm f/2.8-4. Emmanuel Pampuri 22,449 views. Yes, Tamron is not so fast, but its a lens for APSC format sensor. For the people that own this camera how does it compare to the Panasonic FZ2500? The fact this smaller sensor is comparable to the M43 shows how good it is (or how slowly the M43 sensors are progressing?). It's equivalent focal length of roughly 36-80mm may not be all that familiar these days, but it makes for a nice walk-around lens for landscapes and portraits alike. This limitation is easy to workaround with a small external recorder, which could even be used as a great reversible solution. Explorez toutes les caractéristiques et fonctionnalités des Appareils photo Cyber-shot. Sony RX10 V is also expected to arrive this year. I have the previous model, an amazing camera already. Is it literally perfect? I read online recently (Sony RX10 Flickr group) that the Sony RX10 IV shoots between f7-f12 majority of the time instead of f2.4-f4. The Video capability of the D7500 is inferior to the RX10iv. reply, yeah MKI/II were mechanical to 3200, MKIII/IV mechanical to 2000.both shutters slow down a bit at wide-open. It looks like you're using an ad blocker. Having to fiddle around with add on NDs is clumsy and irritating. I got my treasured FZ1000 from John Lewis , because the first from LCE online arrived well, but the lens was ruined by the trip. Sony's powerhouse 20.1MP, 24-600mm, 4K 30p bridge camera is down to just £1,359 (Image credit: Sony) Sony's latest, powerhouse, premium bridge camera is available with a cool £240 discount – the Sony RX10 IV is just £1,359 in this amazing Amazon offer! I couldn't even get stable video shot on a tripod! Nothing happens when you turn it. He should have added while shooting in burst mode. I think I'v finally found almost the only camera I'll ever need! Starting conversations about the positive action people like you and I are taking to make a change, we discover and discuss strategies that result in the expansion of natural areas. Yes I shoot sports with my RX10iv all the time and find the inability to zoom while shooting bursts more an annoyance than lack of an essential feature. If I purchase a 100-400mm L lens for it (here the total would amount to about $3300) which camera would take the better sports photos? - High zoom 24-600mm (25x) F2.4-4.0 ZEISS® Lens- 20.1 MP 1" Exmor RS® CMOS sensor w/ DRAM- 4K movie recording w/ direct pixel readout and no pixel binning- Super slow-motion movie HFR (High frame rate) up to 960 fps (40x)- Fast Intelligent AF achieves autofocus as quick as 0.09-sec. You need to check the lens, and avoid buying online if you can. My SONY A7 with 35mm Zeiss making no great effort in the study of light and shade; almost there. Since it is physically impossible to have a FF sensor with such a lens, and size/weight I refuse to listen to opinions about low light noise, ets. It’s the way I usually shoot action even with mechanical zoom but for others it could be a drawback. Yes other manufacturers do this also. Are you sure you're not talking about the RX10/10ii? However, it always pays to remember that, no matter how big it is, it's how you make it big that really counts. Appareil photo Bridge Sony DSC-RX10 Mark III au meilleur rapport qualité/prix ! The Roebling Bridge and Downtown Cincinnati. Because of the (tourist bridge camera) shape and smallish size of the RX10IV, I think it is even better for stealth videography (vs the videocamera shape of XF400/NX80) where a news journalist tries to hide the fact that he/she is a professional.Nevertheless, here are the features of XF400 that are better vs the RX10IV: (1) The XF400 has a 3.5" fully touch operable reversible screen vs the 3" tilting-only touch screen of the RX10, (2) tilting viewfinder vs RX10's straight viewfinder, (3) 50fps 4K vs 25fps 4K on the RX10, (4) unlimited dual card recording vs RX10's single card 30-minute limit. You want to start at full zoom and zoom out as the planes diverge. Robotics company MRMC has seen demand for its remote camera pods explode in the past 12 months, including at the recent presidential inauguration in the US. The lens absolutely makes this camera far better (the king) than its competitors, it's a state of the art ZEISS lens with stellar image quality. High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. The new camera is fabulous for birds in flight, the RX10iii was absolutely hopeless. In addition the AF of such lenses isn't very good. By the time the refund had arrived (I had also got rid of an RX10 which was equally hopeless) , I had the luck to speak to a human. Here's a sample of a cardinal biting the beak of a sparrow:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zl6KIDmM9gAnd lots more bird slow motion on instagram if anyone is interested:https://www.instagram.com/specialbirds/. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. Going by what the reviews say the RX10iv has better AF. isn't the leaf shutter in the rx10 mkII mechanical to 1/3200 ? Photographer Kevin Raposo wanted to see if the 108MP Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra could best a professional DSLR camera. A7R2 far better image quality I would assume compared to my ancient A7? Sony is superior for everything else, as well it should be, since it costs 60% more. No difference for exposure. Agree about the Sony menus. You don't get the cool, super-high-speed frame rate options offered by the Sony cameras, but 1080/120p is not too shabby. The autofocus was updated in this model; however, the camera still struggled to find the subject focus on the birds, regularly focusing on leaves and branches. Phase detection, The G-Tech heated pouch can keep you—and your batteries—warm in winter conditions. That very question has already been asked on the Sony forum. However, when the demo unit arrived, it was damaged. Sony's FE 35mm F1.4 GM is an impressively sharp and long-awaited pro-level 35mm optic for full-frame Sony E-mount cameras. So is it the most capable all-in-one camera on the market? Done deal. (fi. Here, the f4 of the RX10m4 gathers the same "amount of photons" as a full frame camera at f12. 6-10 mp is easily enough for all but very large prints, those bigger than 16x20. In AF-C you can zoom *or* focus, but not both at the same time. Now, I'd like Sony to come out with a version of the original, smaller and lighter RX10 with the constant-aperture 24-200mm lens - but with the sensor, image processing, autofocus and video ability of the Mark IV. quand je n'ai pas de shooting important prévu......je pars avec le sony rx10 mkIV bien que comme tout boitier à petit capteur, il y ait des limites !!!! Can anyone who currently owns this camera verify or deny this claim? A Micro Four Thirds camera that uses the same AI photo trickery as smartphones to improve the way pictures look promises open-source access for custom applications and live streaming video direct through your phone. Simply put, these cameras are the cream of the crop right now. It may just ask Santa to put one in a stocking for me at Christmas. Heck, people were up in arms about the price of the RX10 III. Here's a gallery of images they shot while testing the camera, straight from the frozen northlands. it is always sad when the full frame big sensor trolls go around in their prams trying to act big because full is better than medium. Not true if you desire PDAF which makes a massive difference for focusing on moving subjects. The fact that this camera can reasonably be compared to a sports SLR speaks volumes. Four times larger than most bridge cameras with a 1/2.3 sensor, providing better low light and depth of field performance. Put your finger back on the shutter to focus and shoot a fresh burst, means you can no longer zoom at the same time. + parfocal lens (pity is only 29mm vs 24mm on rx10), + instant hdr ( most of the new 4k tv's are all hdr compatible), + built-in nd filters++ internal zoom. Q: is it possible doing macro with this camera too? For hiking and bird photography, this could be ideal. The camera sports a 24-600mm Zeiss Vario-Sonnar lens with F2.4-4 aperture. Complaining about it is a bit pointless. I'd rather hedge my bets on this cameras optical quality than try to scour through expensive DSLR lenses with very limited range. The a7 III and Canon R6 were each shot with lenses capable of F1.8 and F1.2, but we set the lenses to F5.6 (we do for every full-frame ILC). At 20.1 pixels you should be able to crop a bit to get in closer. Their high ISO capabilities are only slightly better than the FZ1000. A lot has changed since Jake Hicks' excellent tutorial was written. Quite possibly that just freaks out the autofocus algorithm and leads to unsatisfying performance. It's come to light that a Kickstarter campaign we shared back in November 2020 is very likely a scam. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. It’s true!